A decade ago we got a supplier in to replace the doors in our house. At one point, Darryl – over 2m tall, burly and holding my housekeys – insisted I write a cheque there and then as final payment.
I was too scared to refuse, even though he had not completed all the work we’d agreed, and some of it was to a shocking standard.
I dearly wished we’d had a clear contract to refer back to. I knew that once he’d been paid, he would hand back my keys (phew), but it’d be very unlikely that he’d fix the faults and minor outstanding items… it was so stressful.
Of course, this is a microcosm of what happens on projects big and small every single day, either when sections are completed, subcontract works are finished or the whole project is done and dusted. The typical consequences for the parties when a project is recorded as complete include:
- the supplier’s principal obligations are completed
- title, risk and insurance obligations pass to the client
- project security documents, such as bonds or guarantees, expire; product insurances and guarantees start
- further payments are due – a final stage/interim payment, other tidying up sums and half any retention
- project mechanisms end ie the right to change the scope, or to reject goods and a get a refund
- liabilities crystallise such as any compensation for delayed completion
- design details, documents and/or training need to be provided to the client
- new remedies start, such as a defects period – when the client can ask the supplier to sort out problems – or a new phase of testing
- the limitation period begins ie the legal period during which any claims must be brought.
Everyone wants the project to be over – either to celebrate their successes or to chalk it down to experience and move on!
What should you do?
Completion is a tricky point in any project.
You must be clear before you start what it means to complete the project for both the client, its supplier and any stakeholders.
Who should decide completion and on what basis? Is it one person’s opinion (like the client or a contract administrator) or it is based on specific tests to ensure the goods/works can be used as intended?
Don’t over-complicate this though, as the courts generally say it is easier to see than to define!